Biden Reverses Trumps Withdrawal Of U.S. Troops From Somalia

In the wake of a growing threat from al-Qaeda affiliate al-Shabaab, Biden is reversing Trumps withdrawal of troops from Somalia. This small, persistent presence may be one of the first strong foreign policy moves by the Biden administration since he took office.

According to top Military leaders, this force will ease safety concerns for troops deployed in and around Somalia. The main goal of the limited Military presence will be to "train, advise, and assist Somali partner forces to disrupt, degrade, and monitor al-Shabaab".

"Our forces are not now, or will they be directly engaged in combat operations,... The purpose is to enable a more effective fight against al-Shabaab by local forces."

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby

The last 16 months of episodic U.S. Military presence in the region has been largely ineffective and unsustainable. Critical intel is lost in the constant transition, where a persistent presence would be able to maintain better continuity.

The U.S. Military presence in Somalia will be limited to 500 troops working alongside and supporting both local and international forces.

Ironically, the Biden Administration used the same authorization for use of Military force passed by Congress after the terrorist attacks on 9/11. Hopefully this will go better than the Biden debacle in Afghanistan in August of last year.

Only time will tell, but hopefully this is a good move that enhances the safety of the men and women serving in the Somalia region.

What do you think, is this a good move? Will a persistent force in Somalia help keep U.S. Servicemembers safe? How do you feel about the Biden administration invoking the same authorization used to combat al-Qaeda in Afghanistan after 9/11? Let us know in the comments.

Most Recent Stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

32 comments on “Biden Reverses Trumps Withdrawal Of U.S. Troops From Somalia”

  1. Who is the phony-in-chief trying to kid ??? This is just the first step of involving our troops(AGAIN) in a country where we have no business being, it will escalate when Americans start dying over there. Please don't insult our intelligence by claiming our forces won't be involved in combat operations. We might better use those troops at our southern border where the lunatic-in-chief has his open border policy for illegal voters and an absolute threat to OUR National Security !!!!!

    1. The main goal of the limited Military presence will be to “train, advise, and assist Somali partner forces to disrupt, degrade, ”. Substitute Vietnam for Somali and this is a repeat.

      It is interesting the war in Afghan ended and now we are involved with Ukraine. The military industrial complex did not wait to get involved in another war.

      1. Just as big Pharma, the food industry and fuel corporations the Defense industry is owned and operated by those who are evil incarnate.

        The food industry, the healthcare which includes Pharmceutical companies conspired decades ago to cause misery among the Common Good, the top 2% of the earth's most wealthy people are simply defined as pure evil.

    2. You are so right. This is what is wrong with this country, we keep getting into other countries civil wars. It is all about BIG BUSINESS (MONEY, MONEY). Washington does not give a rat ass about our citizens who were born here.

    3. It's part of the incompetent Democrats' plan to always have a war "on tap" to go to when their horrible economic policies fail. This plan is an old democrat tradition going at least as far back as WWII. That's why virtually all of our past wars have started under democrat administrations and been ended by republican administrations. If FDR didn't invite WWII why did he put unprotected American merchant ships in the Atlantic? When the U-boats were too smart to torpedo our ships, he put an even greater economic squeeze on japan. The result - Pearl Harbor.

        1. Any examples to back up your conclusions? Eisenhower sent non combatant "advisers" to South Viet nam. We followed that up when Kennedy sent American fighting troops. Johnson really screwed the pooch by increasing the numbers of American troops massively. One example that might support your statement would be W's going all out against Irac because our so called "military intelligence" (oxymoron) claimed Hussain still had weapons of mass destruction. We trained the Irac forces for 10 years only to have them throw down their weapons and run leaving millions of dollars of military equipment to the enemy! Apparently we taught them to sit up, roll over and play dead because they sure weren't trained to fight. One thing they could do was shoot their American training officers in the back and flee. One example of a "war" that a republican president can take full credit for would be Grenada. Reagan sent American forces to stop Cuba's attempt to take over the island. It seems to have been cleaned up in less than a week in spite of our various services involved not having common radio frequencys.

    1. That's the plan - keep us baffled with BS especially since it's getting close to midterms. There is absolutely nothing 'he' does that is good for the U.S. or the REAL Americans - NOTHING!

      1. It's borderline retardation in my opinion anyway for anyone to not see that the current administration has NO PLANS to do anything that benefits we the people..... THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT IS .....
        foreigners are being better taken care of and a whole he'll of a lot of people are deceived

  2. Buffoon Biden is doing what his Deep State handlers tells him to do in the effort to destroy this Republic. It IS that simple.

    1. WE HAVE NO BUSINESS THERE AT ALL. CLEAN UP OUR OWN COUNTRY FIRST. TAKE CARE OF OUR BORDER. CLEAN UP OUR HOMELESS MESS ONCE AND FOR ALL. BIDENS HANDLERS ARE NOT FOR AMERICA. WE NEED TO ENFORCE OUR LAWS AND OUR POLICE DEPT.

    2. IMO they want one world order with them in charge, that is why all the gun control is all ways going on!!!

  3. Just another distraction by the Demonrats is all I see. That and the fact that fewer troops are here when it hits the fan.

  4. Somalia is and always has been a nation with no stable government it is ran by clans controlled by warlords, the United States government has never had any business putting troops in Harm's Way in any nation predominantly populated by muslims, not Afghanistan, not Iraq, and certainly not Somalia.

  5. BIDEN SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE FOR TREASON, ABUSE OF POWER, AND BEING CORRUPT AS HELL. HE IS A WOIKEASS DUMBASS SCUMBAG. EVERYTHING HE DOES TURNS TO SHIT. LETS GO BRANDON

  6. Kind of reminds me of MAG units used in Vietnam during the years prior to our "commitment" to the war in Vietnam. One thing that is consistent, "you cannot trust the DNC".

  7. How bout Biden putting some US troops on the southern border for our countries protection. He has not a clue as to whom or what is coming into our country!

    1. 10 yrs ago a VFW commander told we could fix the border, just send all us old farts down they, all it would cost is beans beer & bullets. Knowing full well we would take only one order ( don't shoot south bounders)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. History, if the dishonest revisionists don't get to rewrite it, will remember Biden as a f___up looking for a place to happen.

  9. Joe is worried about terrorist, well they are walking across the southern border & he just keeps selling snake oil to them. Then we get to pay for them & the libs can't figure out why people are pissed.

  10. the southern border in our own country has been ignored intentionally by this administration and it is like everything done so far action wilk be taken when it is too late. Too bad Biden has an identity problem and thinks he can fix what wasn't broken by breaking it and blame everybody but himself .When this country is so infiltrated with illegals and drugs brought in by many of them and the cartels are reaping the harvest Biden won't see the damage because he doesn't have the youth he once had and probobly won't be around anymore to witness the damage he has done,

  11. Another situation of a political action using our military who are put in a no win situation. They just become sitting ducks with their hands tied. IMO.....our military should only be used to go in and kick butt , complete the mission and get out. All without politicians using them as pawns in their game.

  12. I've heard comments like that before! They start off quietly on the 5th page of a newspaper, then end up as headlines on Page 1. We shall see!

Copyright 2024, Thin Line News LLC