Former intelligence officials face potential prosecution after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released over 100 classified documents detailing an alleged conspiracy against Donald Trump.
According to The Western Journal, the documents suggest that former President Barack Obama and his senior officials manufactured intelligence to undermine Trump's presidency following the 2016 election.
The newly declassified documents indicate that prior to December 2016, intelligence assessments consistently found no evidence of Russian interference in the election results. This changed dramatically after a December 9 meeting in the White House Situation Room, where over two dozen senior Obama administration officials, including CIA Director John Brennan and DNI James Clapper, gathered to discuss punitive actions against Russia.
Key Players in Alleged Intelligence Manipulation
Director Gabbard emphasized the far-reaching implications of the documents during her appearance on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures." She described the actions as a "treasonous conspiracy" that involved multiple high-ranking officials working to subvert the will of American voters.
The documents reveal that intelligence analysts had previously requested softer language regarding Russian election interference, specifically noting there was no evidence of Russia's intent to influence the election outcomes. This stance changed abruptly following what Gabbard describes as "high Administration interest" and "new guidance."
The declassified materials show a stark contrast between intelligence assessments before and after December 8, 2016. A draft of the president's daily intelligence briefing from that date stated no impact from Russian cyber activities on election infrastructure was found.
Criminal Referrals and Legal Implications
Gabbard has announced her intention to forward the documents to the Department of Justice and FBI for criminal referral. This move could potentially lead to unprecedented legal action against former administration officials.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel will be responsible for determining the next steps in the investigation. The scope of potential prosecutions could be extensive, given Gabbard's assertion that the conspiracy involved numerous individuals across various government agencies.
The DNI emphasized that the implications of these documents are "nothing short of historic" and warrant comprehensive legal action. She stressed that accountability must extend beyond just a few individuals due to the widespread nature of the alleged conspiracy.
Timeline of Intelligence Assessment Changes
A crucial document dated September 2, 2016, shows intelligence analysts actively working to avoid misleading readers about Russia's alleged election interference. This approach markedly shifted following the December White House meeting.
The transformation of intelligence assessments occurred within a 24-hour period between December 8 and 9, 2016. The original assessment finding no Russian interference was pulled from publication, and a new narrative emerged following the high-level meeting.
Multiple documents reference "high level of congressional and White House interest" and "POTUS tasking" as driving forces behind the changed assessments. These references suggest direct involvement from senior leadership in reshaping the intelligence narrative.
Investigation Moves Forward
The release of these documents represents a significant development in understanding the origins of the Russia collusion narrative. The evidence suggests a coordinated effort to create a false narrative about Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The Department of Justice and FBI will now examine the evidence for potential criminal prosecution. Gabbard's criminal referral indicates her belief that sufficient evidence exists to pursue legal action against those involved in the alleged conspiracy.
The investigation's outcome could have far-reaching implications for former Obama administration officials and others involved in perpetuating what Gabbard describes as a years-long coup attempt against President Trump. The documents provide a detailed timeline of how intelligence assessments were allegedly manipulated to support a narrative that contradicted earlier findings.
