A startling confrontation between an Ohio physician and a Jewish congressman has sparked national outrage and renewed concerns about politically motivated violence against elected officials. Dr. Feras Hamdan, 36, faces serious charges after allegedly forcing Representative Max Miller and his family off the road in what authorities describe as a targeted attack.
According to Newsweek, the incident occurred on June 15 in Rocky River, a Cleveland suburb, when Hamdan allegedly tailgated Miller's vehicle, made aggressive maneuvers, and ultimately forced the congressman's car off the road. The incident took a more disturbing turn when Miller reported that the suspect shouted antisemitic threats while displaying a Palestinian flag.
Miller was traveling with his wife and 2-year-old son when the incident occurred, adding to the severity of the situation. The congressman, who is Jewish and represents Ohio's 7th District, reported that the suspect threatened to "cut your throat and your daughter's" while calling him a "dirty Jew."
Dangerous Encounter Leads to Arrest
The confrontation escalated quickly as Hamdan allegedly pursued Miller's vehicle on Interstate 90. Police reports indicate that the suspect repeatedly honked his horn and made threatening gestures while attempting to block Miller from changing lanes.
Hamdan, who has ties to the Cleveland Clinic and other medical facilities in the area, turned himself in to authorities on Friday. He was promptly arrested and charged with aggravated menacing, a first-degree misdemeanor.
During his arraignment at Rocky River Municipal Court, Hamdan entered a not guilty plea and requested a jury trial. The judge set his bond at $500,000 and issued a criminal protective order to prevent any contact with Miller and his family.
Political Leaders Condemn Attack
House Speaker Mike Johnson quickly denounced the incident as "an outrageous act of political violence" against a sitting member of Congress. He called for the Department of Justice to investigate whether the attack violated federal civil rights laws.
Democratic House leaders joined in condemning the attack, expressing relief that Miller and his family emerged unharmed. The bipartisan response highlights the growing concern over political violence and antisemitism in America.
The incident has drawn particular attention given Miller's profile as a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump and his strong stance on Israeli issues. The congressman, a former Marine, stated he "will not hide in the face of this blatant antisemitic violence."
Legal Defense Claims Political Manipulation
Hamdan's attorney, Issa Elkhatib, has strongly defended his client, characterizing the allegations as baseless and politically motivated. In a lengthy statement, he emphasized Hamdan's professional reputation and community standing.
The case has attracted the attention of multiple law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, U.S. Capitol Police, Ohio State Highway Patrol, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Ohio. Their joint investigation continues to gather evidence and examine potential federal charges.
Hamdan's medical background has come under scrutiny, with records showing he received his medical degree from the Medical University of the Americas and has practiced for 6-10 years. His professional future now hangs in the balance as legal proceedings move forward.
Federal Investigation Intensifies
The severity of the incident has prompted a comprehensive investigation by multiple agencies, reflecting the serious nature of threats against elected officials. A pre-trial hearing has been scheduled for July 8, where more details about the case are expected to emerge.
The attack has reignited discussions about the intersection of political tensions and public safety, particularly concerning antisemitism and violence against public officials. The incident represents a troubling example of how political and ethnic tensions can escalate into dangerous confrontations.
The case continues to draw national attention as authorities work to determine whether additional charges, particularly at the federal level, may be warranted. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for how similar incidents are handled in the future.
