President Donald Trump has taken a decisive stand against globalist migration policies with a fresh executive order.
Trump signed the order on Wednesday, pulling the United States out of the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD), a body linked to the United Nations’ Global Compact for Migration, as reported by Fox News.
This action severs ties with an organization long criticized for pushing mass migration and challenging national borders. The GFMD has been instrumental in crafting the UN’s migration compact, a framework that promotes international collaboration on migrant rights and policies. Critics argue this setup dilutes a nation’s ability to govern its own immigration laws.
Rejecting Global Pressure on Borders
Trump’s move directly counters the Biden administration’s prior support for the GFMD and the broader UN migration agenda. It signals a return to prioritizing American control over border security.
Principal Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott didn’t hold back, stating, “For too long, international organizations have fueled an endless flow of mass migration and have sought to compel Americans to accept the same destructive agenda.” His words nail the frustration many feel about external meddling in domestic policy.
Pigott further emphasized, “Under President Trump, the era of mass migration is over.” That’s a bold promise, and it’s clear the administration aims to dismantle any platform that softens borders or peddles a supposed right to migrate.
Criticism of GFMD’s Migration Stance
The GFMD has drawn sharp rebuke for opposing the criminalization of unauthorized migration and for aligning with groups that decry large-scale deportations. Its events have even pushed against narratives framing migrants as lawbreakers, which many see as out of touch with border realities.
In a 2020 document, the forum urged governments and media to ditch terms like “illegal migrant,” claiming such language stokes division. This kind of word-policing reeks of an agenda more concerned with optics than addressing the hard truths of enforcement.
The organization also touts remittances as a global economic boon, while critics point out the massive drain of billions from the US economy each year. That’s money that could bolster communities here, not fund distant accounts.
Sovereignty Over Globalist Ideals
Administration officials frame this withdrawal as part of Trump’s larger mission to reclaim US authority over immigration rules. They reject what they see as pressure from global bodies to accept unchecked migration flows.
Pigott doubled down, declaring, “The United States will not hesitate to assert sovereign control of its border, protect the true God-given natural rights, and end wasteful globalist spending.” His statement cuts through the fog of international rhetoric with a clear focus on national priorities.
The GFMD’s ties to advocacy groups, including input from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation on migration messaging, only fuel suspicions of biased influence. Many Americans question why unelected elites should shape how we handle our own borders.
Lessons from Past and Abroad
Trump’s first term already saw exits from UN-backed deals like the Paris climate agreement, deemed incompatible with US interests. This latest step aligns with that pattern of putting domestic law first.
Officials often point to Europe’s migrant crisis as a cautionary tale, where lax policies have strained public resources and sparked unrest. It’s a stark reminder of what’s at stake if sovereignty takes a backseat to global ideals.
This executive order isn’t just a policy shift; it’s a loud rejection of frameworks that erode national control. For those weary of seeing borders treated as suggestions, Trump’s action offers a firm line in the sand.
