Trump Says U.S. will Take Action on Greenland Amid NATO Criticism

 January 10, 2026

Website title:

President Donald Trump stated during a press appearance that the United States intends to move forward on Greenland “whether they like it or not,” citing national security concerns related to Russia and China.

The announcement follows diplomatic pushback from NATO members and allied countries, who argue Greenland’s future must be determined by Denmark and the island’s own people.

Trump made the statement from the East Room following a meeting with oil executives and top Cabinet officials. When questioned by the press, he stated that he preferred a diplomatic solution but made it clear that the U.S. was prepared to act unilaterally if necessary. His remarks directly referenced the threat of geopolitical rivals entering the Arctic region first.

International Leaders Push Back On Remarks

According to Breitbart, earlier in the week, leaders from NATO nations, including France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Canada, signed a joint statement affirming Denmark’s control over Greenland. They were joined by Spain, Poland, and Italy in calling for self-determination by the Greenlandic population.

Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen publicly warned that any forced move by the U.S. could break NATO unity and threaten the long-standing transatlantic alliance. Canada responded to Trump’s announcement by planning a new consulate in Greenland’s capital of Nuuk.

Trump recently appointed Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as the new U.S. Special Envoy to Greenland, stating Landry “understands how essential Greenland is to our National Security” and will play a critical role in protecting allied interests.

Greenland’s Strategic Role Stirs Debate

Vice President JD Vance visited Greenland in 2025, signaling the administration’s deep interest in securing an American presence on the island. That visit was part of a broader push by the administration to revisit the idea of acquiring the island for strategic benefit.

Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller added fuel to the fire earlier this week by questioning the legitimacy of Denmark’s hold on the territory. “What is the basis of their territorial claim?” Miller asked, portraying Greenland as a de facto colony under European control.

According to Trump, the issue isn’t just about resources or geography—it’s about keeping America ahead of its adversaries. “If we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland,” he said, adding that the U.S. isn’t about to have either as a direct northern neighbor. “We're going to do it the hard way,” if necessary, Trump added.

Critics Warn Of Diplomatic Consequences

The issue has sparked debate among global leaders and diplomatic circles. While U.S. officials emphasize security and strategic interests, critics warn that bypassing Denmark and Greenland’s elected government could fracture key alliances.

Frederiksen didn’t mince words, saying any annexation could “dismantle NATO.” That’s not something any rational Western country should take lightly—but it also shouldn’t be used as a shield against honest negotiations about the Arctic’s future.

Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney echoed Denmark’s sovereignty position, urging that decisions about Greenland must remain with its people. Canada’s symbolic move of opening a new diplomatic post in Nuuk signals its intention to align with Europe.

Calls For Sovereignty Clash With Security

The administration shows no signs of walking back. Trump and his team continue to reinforce that Greenland is no longer just an icy curiosity on the world map—it’s a heating point in global competition with foes like Russia and China. Stephen Miller summed up the administration’s confidence when he said, “Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.” Judging by the alliances forming up against Washington, though, the battlefield might be diplomatic rather than military.

For now, the message from the White House is clear: the United States will not idly watch as adversaries inch closer to American territory, even if the cost is diplomatic friction inside NATO. Where Washington goes from here, and how far it’s willing to push, remains to be seen.

Most Recent Stories

Copyright 2024, Thin Line News LLC